Religious rights vs newly anointed homosexual rights

I am having a very hard time understanding how the 240 year old constitutional right to "freedom of religion" (Amendment 1) can be so easily destroyed by the newly concocted homosexual right to being served at a private business regardless of the owners objections. What is right about destroying one person's rights in order to give special privilege to another? The last I heard, the American population was still over 70% Christian and the homosexual population was only 5%.  In the past state after state has voted not to allow homosexual marriage. Liberal judge after liberal judge has overturned each of those election results. As I point out in my book, liberals can not win at the polls, they have to rely on liberal activist judges to advance their agenda. I also mention the fact that "we the people" votes no longer mean much in this age of judicial activism.This is just another example of one third of the Constitutional checks and balances being abused. Judges making law was not intended by the Founding Fathers.

Colorado liberals passed a new anti-discrimination law that was specifically designed to be used to get Christian's minds right about homosexuals. The law is backed up by a "rights" commission. Since its inception Christian business owners have been targeted for destruction by the homosexual lobby and have had to endure case after case of forced "tolerance" for the homosexual lifestyle. In all cases new homosexual rights have trumped long-standing religious rights. Exact duplicates of complaints against homosexual bakeries refusing to bake Christian cakes have fallen on deaf ears. Don't try to say the new laws and commission aren't specifically designed for homosexual lifestyle advancement.

With the support of the new laws in Colorado two homosexual men traveled from out of state to destroy another Christian bakery. They asked a baker to make their wedding cake knowing he would refuse because of his religious convictions against homosexual marriage. Even though he had never refused to serve homosexuals in any other capacity at his bakery, they sued him for discrimination. He was found guilty by a liberal Colorado court and then enter the all-knowing, all-powerful "rights commission". They gave him a large fine to pay, ordered him to bake the cake, and to add insult to financial injury, ordered him to give his entire bakery staff some sort of homosexual "sensitivity training". The homosexuals got their 15 minutes of fame, a little spending money for their honeymoon and the bragging rights on how they destroyed another Christian business, its owners and employees. All in a good day's work, huh?

There are so many things wrong with this reoccurring scenario that it will be hard to break it down. Let's start with the fact that the commissioners are not elected officials. They are appointed so basically they don't answer to anyone. Their decisions are pretty much final leaving little room for appeal from their injustices. Next to consider is the fact that the homosexual couple traveled from out-of-state with the obvious intention of finding a baker who would refuse their request. With that in mind, it is equally obvious they didn't just want a cake. How many bakeries do you think they passed on their way to this particular one?  All this leads up to the real reason this took place: to destroy another non-believer of the homosexual agenda. The destruction of Christianity is the ultimate goal. With Christianity out of the way, or at least afraid to speak up for fear of retribution, there will be few left with the nerve to reject the advancement of the homosexual lifestyle.

When a Christian comes across a non-believer he/she attempts to show the person a better path. When a homosexual finds a non-believer he wants him destroyed at all costs. It is not hard for me to see which group is most tolerant of the other.

God Bless America!!!