I read this morning that the Fourth US Circuit Court of
Appeals in Washington DC struck down the North Carolina voter ID law because it
discriminates against African-Americans. The court ruling stated: “We can only
conclude that the North Carolina General Assembly enacted the challenged
provisions of the law with discriminatory intent”. This is just another example
of how liberal activist judges can thwart any and all legitimately enacted laws,
backed by the citizens, that defy their liberal ideology. Not being a student
of jurisprudence I have to rely on my God-given common sense. In this
particular case my common sense tells me that the state of North Carolina
enacted a voter ID law with the distinct intention of preventing voter fraud
that is rampant in liberal leaning voter precincts. That sounds like
discrimination because most liberal leaning voter precincts are made up of
minorities. But that same common sense is used by law enforcement because their
job is to go to the areas that are the most lawless.
In 2008 the United States Supreme Court upheld voter ID laws
in Arizona and Indiana stating “it is not unconstitutional to require a voter
to produce photo ID because the states have a valid interest in deterring voter
fraud”. In 1973 the United States Supreme Court upheld the legality of abortion
in the landmark Roe v Wade lawsuit. Liberals now claim that since the Roe v
Wade case ruled that legal abortion is now the law of the land it cannot now be
contested. Why is the 2008 United States Supreme Court ruling upholding
requiring voter ID not the law of the land? Why is it that the NAACP, the ACLU,
and Obama’s Department of Justice can now question all state voter ID laws?
Liberals always manage to have it both ways so long as both ways support their
socialistic agenda.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures
there are 18 states that do not require any documentation to vote. There are 13
states that require some form of ID to vote but do not require a photo on the
ID. There are eight states that have a photo ID request but not necessarily a
requirement. There are two states that have very strict ID requirements but do
not require photos. There are only nine states that have strict photo ID
requirements. Do you honestly believe it to be a coincidence that the states
with no ID requirements or very lax ID requirements are controlled by liberals?
The most popular liberal argument opposing the photo ID for
voting relies on the “victim” status of those who will be most disenfranchised
because of the requirement. The poor, the young, the elderly, women, and
minorities will be the most affected. Those categories also coincide with the
victim list of our unjust “angry white men” laws that currently rule their
lives. They claim that there are millions that fall within that victim list
that have never had a driver’s license and have no intention of getting one.
There are many on that list that use public transit to go wherever they need to
go. They have to use public transit to go to their doctor, or the market, or
the liquor store, or to see their grandbabies, or to get to school. Common
sense would dictate that if they can use public transit to get to all of those
places that surely one of those buses will go past a DMV where they can obtain
a non-driving photo ID. Many of the “non-driving” rely on family or friends to
get them to their destinations. Regardless of the form of transportation they
use to go vote that same form of transportation can easily be used to go and obtain
a non-driving photo ID. Common sense will always overrule a pathetic liberal
excuse for “victimhood”. The truth and facts will always win against an
emotional liberal argument. One emotional liberal argument claims that the
above referenced victims would be required to stand in line at a DMV to
obtain a non-driving photo ID. Welcome to the world of the living. Those same
victims will stand in line at school for a free lunch; they will stand in line
at the convenience store for cigarettes and a lotto ticket; they will stand in
line at the market to buy food for their children; but standing in line to help
prevent voter fraud is an unreasonable request to make of them. You also have
to assume that since they don’t drive they also don’t fly; they don’t ever cash
checks; they never go to NAACP indoor events; and lastly, God forbid, they
never go to the Democratic National Convention because all of the above require
a photo ID for access. In this day and age of illegal immigration and terrorist
access through our open borders common sense had better prevail over political
correctness or America is in even more serious trouble in the future.
If you consider the way that Hillary, the Democratic
National Committee and its chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, treated one of
their own liberal/socialists Bernie Sanders, it stands to reason how much
lying, cheating, and voter fraud will be used in the national presidential election
against Donald Trump. It was claimed by many that there could very well have
been in excess of 2 million fraudulent Democrat votes cast for Obama in 2012.
This 2016 presidential election is even more critical to the liberals. I will
predict that Donald Trump will have to obtain a minimum of 5 million more
legitimate votes to beat Hillary and her millions offraudulent votes. If the vote
count is even close Hillary will win. Even if Trump were to win in a landslide
Hillary will not go down to defeat easily. She will contest the vote count at
every level and at each level she will obtain thousands of additional votes. Votes
for Hillary will magically appear in the trunks of cars, in the attics and
basements of liberal courthouses, and in the names of long dead liberal voters. According
to a liberal it is their God-given right to cheat in order to advance their
ideology. God help America!
God Bless America!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment